[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140427165200.GA3956@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 18:52:01 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <aarapov@...hat.com>,
David Long <dave.long@...aro.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
Jonathan Lebon <jlebon@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] uprobes/x86: cleanup "riprel" functions
On 04/25, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 04/17, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > This series only fixes the problem. I'll send more changes to address
> > some of TODO's mentioned in the changelogs later.
>
> This is probably the last series I am sending in this thread, before the
> next PULL request. This completes the changes which I planned from the
> very beginning, except "emulate jczx/loopz" which I am still unsure about.
I lied, let me send another short series.
I was not going to do this now, I am a bit tired of uprobes ;) But it seems
that Denys has a very good idea, we can simplify rip-relative handling.
However, if we are are going to change this code, imho we need to cleanup it
first. handle_riprel_insn(), pre_xol_rip_insn() and handle_riprel_post_xol()
look really annoying, imho. Even the naming asks for the cleanup imo, despite
the fact that usually I ignore the naming completely.
Oleg.
arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists