linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clkdev: only fall through to clk_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <535D55C6.9090609@gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 27 Apr 2014 21:08:54 +0200
From:	Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@...il.com>
To:	Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
CC:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clkdev: only fall through to clk_get_sys() if DT indicates
 no entry

On 04/26/2014 05:49 PM, Russell King wrote:
> There are two failures which DT can return when looking up a phandle:
> -ENOENT - when DT finds that the desired property/index is not present
> -EINVAL - when DT finds that the desired property/index is present, but
>   there is a problem parsing it.
>
> We should only fall through to clk_get_sys() (the table driven clock
> lookup) when DT indicates that there was no entry in the OF tables
> for the clock.  Doing otherwise causes the clk API to always indicate
> that there is no entry for this clock, which is not correct behaviour.
>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
> ---
> Grant, Rob,
>
> Please let me know ASAP if this gives you any cause for concern.  This
> looks to me like a long standing bug which really needs fixing.  Part
> of the motivation here is similar to Jean-Francois' patch to clkdev
> which allows a DT specified clock which isn't get present to have
> clk_get() and friends return -EPROBE_DEFER - again, something that I
> think really should happen.  Jean-Francois hasn't been able to get
> much traction for his patch, so let's start with fixing this bug first.

How about upstream commit a34cd4666f3da84228a82f70c94b8d9b692034ea,
I thought it already solves the issue you're trying to address in
this patch ?

>   drivers/clk/clkdev.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clkdev.c b/drivers/clk/clkdev.c
> index 48f67218247c..4e65d0e10b05 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clkdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clkdev.c
> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ struct clk *clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *con_id)
>
>   	if (dev) {
>   		clk = of_clk_get_by_name(dev->of_node, con_id);
> -		if (!IS_ERR(clk))
> +		if (!IS_ERR(clk) || PTR_ERR(clk) != -ENOENT)
>   			return clk;
>   	}

--
Regards,
Sylwester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/