linux-kernel - [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Change the calculation of next pstate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <535D80C8.9090906@semaphore.gr>
Date:	Mon, 28 Apr 2014 01:12:24 +0300
From:	Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC:	"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Change the calculation of next pstate

Currently the driver calculates the next pstate proportional to
core_busy factor and reverse proportional to current pstate.

Change the above method and calculate the next pstate independently
of current pstate.

Tested on Intel i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz.
Phoronix benchmark of Linux Kernel Compilation 3.1 test shows an
increase ~1.5% in performance. Below the test results using turbostat
(5 iterations):

Without patch:

Ph. avg Time	Total time	PkgWatt		Total Energy
	79.63	266.416		57.74		15382.85984
	79.63	265.609		57.87		15370.79283
	79.57	266.994		57.54		15362.83476
	79.53	265.304		57.83		15342.53032
	79.71	265.977		57.76		15362.83152
avg	79.61	266.06		57.74		15364.36985

With patch:

Ph. avg Time	Total time	PkgWatt		Total Energy
	78.23	258.826		59.14		15306.96964
	78.41	259.110		59.15		15326.35650
	78.40	258.530		59.26		15320.48780
	78.46	258.673		59.20		15313.44160
	78.19	259.075		59.16		15326.87700
avg	78.34	258.842		59.18		15318.82650

The total test time reduced by ~2.6%, while the total energy
consumption during a test iteration reduced by ~0.35%

Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 15 +++++++--------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
index 0999673..8e309db 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -608,28 +608,27 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_set_sample_time(struct cpudata *cpu)
 	mod_timer_pinned(&cpu->timer, jiffies + delay);
 }
 
-static inline int32_t intel_pstate_get_scaled_busy(struct cpudata *cpu)
+static inline int32_t intel_pstate_get_busy(struct cpudata *cpu)
 {
-	int32_t core_busy, max_pstate, current_pstate;
+	int32_t core_busy, max_pstate;
 
 	core_busy = cpu->sample.core_pct_busy;
 	max_pstate = int_tofp(cpu->pstate.max_pstate);
-	current_pstate = int_tofp(cpu->pstate.current_pstate);
-	core_busy = mul_fp(core_busy, div_fp(max_pstate, current_pstate));
+	core_busy = mul_fp(core_busy, max_pstate);
 	return FP_ROUNDUP(core_busy);
 }
 
 static inline void intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate(struct cpudata *cpu)
 {
-	int32_t busy_scaled;
+	int32_t busy;
 	struct _pid *pid;
 	signed int ctl = 0;
 	int steps;
 
 	pid = &cpu->pid;
-	busy_scaled = intel_pstate_get_scaled_busy(cpu);
+	busy = intel_pstate_get_busy(cpu);
 
-	ctl = pid_calc(pid, busy_scaled);
+	ctl = pid_calc(pid, busy);
 
 	steps = abs(ctl);
 
@@ -651,7 +650,7 @@ static void intel_pstate_timer_func(unsigned long __data)
 	intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate(cpu);
 
 	trace_pstate_sample(fp_toint(sample->core_pct_busy),
-			fp_toint(intel_pstate_get_scaled_busy(cpu)),
+			fp_toint(intel_pstate_get_busy(cpu)),
 			cpu->pstate.current_pstate,
 			sample->mperf,
 			sample->aperf,
-- 
1.9.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/