lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1398571754-12443-6-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Sun, 27 Apr 2014 12:09:00 +0800
From:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 05/10] workqueue: separate iteration role from worker_idr

worker_idr has the iteration and worker ID duties. These two duties
are not necessary tied together. We can separate them and use a list
for iteration.

After separation, we can add the rescuer workers to the list for iteration
in future. worker_idr can't add rescuer workers due to rescuer workers
can't allocate id from worker_idr.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c          |   38 ++++++++++++--------------------------
 kernel/workqueue_internal.h |    1 +
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index f3a6086..0eae42c 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -161,7 +161,8 @@ struct worker_pool {
 	/* see manage_workers() for details on the two manager mutexes */
 	struct mutex		manager_arb;	/* manager arbitration */
 	struct mutex		manager_mutex;	/* manager exclusion */
-	struct idr		worker_idr;	/* M: worker IDs and iteration */
+	struct idr		worker_idr;	/* M: worker IDs */
+	struct list_head	bind_list;	/* M: pool-bound workers */
 	wait_queue_head_t	workers_unbound;/* all workers pool-unbound */
 
 	struct workqueue_attrs	*attrs;		/* I: worker attributes */
@@ -361,22 +362,6 @@ static void copy_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *to,
 		else
 
 /**
- * for_each_pool_worker - iterate through all workers of a worker_pool
- * @worker: iteration cursor
- * @wi: integer used for iteration
- * @pool: worker_pool to iterate workers of
- *
- * This must be called with either @pool->manager_mutex.
- *
- * The if/else clause exists only for the lockdep assertion and can be
- * ignored.
- */
-#define for_each_pool_worker(worker, wi, pool)				\
-	idr_for_each_entry(&(pool)->worker_idr, (worker), (wi))		\
-		if (({ lockdep_assert_held(&pool->manager_mutex); false; })) { } \
-		else
-
-/**
  * for_each_pwq - iterate through all pool_workqueues of the specified workqueue
  * @pwq: iteration cursor
  * @wq: the target workqueue
@@ -1674,6 +1659,7 @@ static struct worker *alloc_worker(void)
 	if (worker) {
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&worker->entry);
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&worker->scheduled);
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&worker->bind_entry);
 		/* on creation a worker is in !idle && prep state */
 		worker->flags = WORKER_PREP;
 	}
@@ -1692,7 +1678,8 @@ static void worker_unbind_pool(struct worker *worker)
 
 	mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex);
 	idr_remove(&pool->worker_idr, worker->id);
-	if (idr_is_empty(&pool->worker_idr))
+	list_del(&worker->bind_entry);
+	if (list_empty(&pool->bind_list))
 		wake_up(&pool->workers_unbound);
 	mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
 }
@@ -1765,6 +1752,7 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
 
 	/* successful, commit the pointer to idr */
 	idr_replace(&pool->worker_idr, worker, worker->id);
+	list_add_tail(&worker->bind_entry, &pool->bind_list);
 
 	return worker;
 
@@ -3473,6 +3461,7 @@ static int init_worker_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
 	mutex_init(&pool->manager_arb);
 	mutex_init(&pool->manager_mutex);
 	idr_init(&pool->worker_idr);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->bind_list);
 	init_waitqueue_head(&pool->workers_unbound);
 
 	INIT_HLIST_NODE(&pool->hash_node);
@@ -3541,7 +3530,7 @@ static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
 	spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
 
 	wait_event_cmd(pool->workers_unbound,
-		       idr_is_empty(&pool->worker_idr),
+		       list_empty(&pool->bind_list),
 		       mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex),
 		       mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex));
 
@@ -4524,7 +4513,6 @@ static void wq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
 	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
 	struct worker_pool *pool;
 	struct worker *worker;
-	int wi;
 
 	for_each_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu) {
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu != smp_processor_id());
@@ -4539,7 +4527,7 @@ static void wq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
 		 * before the last CPU down must be on the cpu.  After
 		 * this, they may become diasporas.
 		 */
-		for_each_pool_worker(worker, wi, pool)
+		list_for_each_entry(worker, &pool->bind_list, bind_entry)
 			worker->flags |= WORKER_UNBOUND;
 
 		pool->flags |= POOL_DISASSOCIATED;
@@ -4585,7 +4573,6 @@ static void wq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
 static void rebind_workers(struct worker_pool *pool)
 {
 	struct worker *worker;
-	int wi;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&pool->manager_mutex);
 
@@ -4596,13 +4583,13 @@ static void rebind_workers(struct worker_pool *pool)
 	 * of all workers first and then clear UNBOUND.  As we're called
 	 * from CPU_ONLINE, the following shouldn't fail.
 	 */
-	for_each_pool_worker(worker, wi, pool)
+	list_for_each_entry(worker, &pool->bind_list, bind_entry)
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task,
 						  pool->attrs->cpumask) < 0);
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
 
-	for_each_pool_worker(worker, wi, pool) {
+	list_for_each_entry(worker, &pool->bind_list, bind_entry) {
 		unsigned int worker_flags = worker->flags;
 
 		/*
@@ -4654,7 +4641,6 @@ static void restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(struct worker_pool *pool, int cpu)
 {
 	static cpumask_t cpumask;
 	struct worker *worker;
-	int wi;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&pool->manager_mutex);
 
@@ -4668,7 +4654,7 @@ static void restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(struct worker_pool *pool, int cpu)
 		return;
 
 	/* as we're called from CPU_ONLINE, the following shouldn't fail */
-	for_each_pool_worker(worker, wi, pool)
+	list_for_each_entry(worker, &pool->bind_list, bind_entry)
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task,
 						  pool->attrs->cpumask) < 0);
 }
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue_internal.h b/kernel/workqueue_internal.h
index 7e2204d..7bff111 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue_internal.h
+++ b/kernel/workqueue_internal.h
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct worker {
 	struct task_struct	*task;		/* I: worker task */
 	struct worker_pool	*pool;		/* I: the associated pool */
 						/* L: for rescuers */
+	struct list_head	bind_entry;	/* M: bound with the pool */
 
 	unsigned long		last_active;	/* L: last active timestamp */
 	unsigned int		flags;		/* X: flags */
-- 
1.7.4.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ