linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -V1 00/22] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140428043909.GA26778@infradead.org>
Date:	Sun, 27 Apr 2014 21:39:09 -0700
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	agruen@...nel.org, bfields@...ldses.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, dhowells@...hat.com,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V1 00/22]  New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl
 interoperability

This doesn't address any or the previous points:

 - common implementation instead of the godawful boilerplate code
   (and we even fixed most of this for Posix ACL by now, so even less
   reason to do the same crap again!)
 - common data structure with Posix ACLs

And of course no real explanation why we need the braindead access/deny
scheme at how it will get properly integrated with the system.

So in this for a clear NAK.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/