lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1398647481.405090313@decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 28 Apr 2014 02:11:21 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "lucien" <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
	"Hannes Frederic Sowa" <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 07/94] ipv6: ip6_append_data_mtu do not handle the mtu
 of the  second fragment properly

3.2.58-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: lucien <lucien.xin@...il.com>

[ Upstream commit e367c2d03dba4c9bcafad24688fadb79dd95b218 ]

In ip6_append_data_mtu(), when the xfrm mode is not tunnel(such as
transport),the ipsec header need to be added in the first fragment, so the mtu
will decrease to reserve space for it, then the second fragment come, the mtu
should be turn back, as the commit 0c1833797a5a6ec23ea9261d979aa18078720b74
said.  however, in the commit a493e60ac4bbe2e977e7129d6d8cbb0dd236be, it use
*mtu = min(*mtu, ...) to change the mtu, which lead to the new mtu is alway
equal with the first fragment's. and cannot turn back.

when I test through  ping6 -c1 -s5000 $ip (mtu=1280):
...frag (0|1232) ESP(spi=0x00002000,seq=0xb), length 1232
...frag (1232|1216)
...frag (2448|1216)
...frag (3664|1216)
...frag (4880|164)

which should be:
...frag (0|1232) ESP(spi=0x00001000,seq=0x1), length 1232
...frag (1232|1232)
...frag (2464|1232)
...frag (3696|1232)
...frag (4928|116)

so delete the min() when change back the mtu.

Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Fixes: 75a493e60ac4bb ("ipv6: ip6_append_data_mtu did not care about pmtudisc and frag_size")
Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c | 14 ++++++--------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
@@ -1191,21 +1191,19 @@ static void ip6_append_data_mtu(unsigned
 				unsigned int fragheaderlen,
 				struct sk_buff *skb,
 				struct rt6_info *rt,
-				bool pmtuprobe)
+				unsigned int orig_mtu)
 {
 	if (!(rt->dst.flags & DST_XFRM_TUNNEL)) {
 		if (skb == NULL) {
 			/* first fragment, reserve header_len */
-			*mtu = *mtu - rt->dst.header_len;
+			*mtu = orig_mtu - rt->dst.header_len;
 
 		} else {
 			/*
 			 * this fragment is not first, the headers
 			 * space is regarded as data space.
 			 */
-			*mtu = min(*mtu, pmtuprobe ?
-				   rt->dst.dev->mtu :
-				   dst_mtu(rt->dst.path));
+			*mtu = orig_mtu;
 		}
 		*maxfraglen = ((*mtu - fragheaderlen) & ~7)
 			      + fragheaderlen - sizeof(struct frag_hdr);
@@ -1222,7 +1220,7 @@ int ip6_append_data(struct sock *sk, int
 	struct ipv6_pinfo *np = inet6_sk(sk);
 	struct inet_cork *cork;
 	struct sk_buff *skb, *skb_prev = NULL;
-	unsigned int maxfraglen, fragheaderlen, mtu;
+	unsigned int maxfraglen, fragheaderlen, mtu, orig_mtu;
 	int exthdrlen;
 	int dst_exthdrlen;
 	int hh_len;
@@ -1307,6 +1305,7 @@ int ip6_append_data(struct sock *sk, int
 		dst_exthdrlen = 0;
 		mtu = cork->fragsize;
 	}
+	orig_mtu = mtu;
 
 	hh_len = LL_RESERVED_SPACE(rt->dst.dev);
 
@@ -1389,8 +1388,7 @@ alloc_new_skb:
 			if (skb == NULL || skb_prev == NULL)
 				ip6_append_data_mtu(&mtu, &maxfraglen,
 						    fragheaderlen, skb, rt,
-						    np->pmtudisc ==
-						    IPV6_PMTUDISC_PROBE);
+						    orig_mtu);
 
 			skb_prev = skb;
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ