[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <535E3040.7090402@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 19:41:04 +0900
From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC: "rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"fweisbec@...il.com" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"tim.bird@...ymobile.com" <tim.bird@...ymobile.com>,
"gkulkarni@...iumnetworks.com" <gkulkarni@...iumnetworks.com>,
"dsaxena@...aro.org" <dsaxena@...aro.org>,
"arndb@...db.de" <arndb@...db.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 6/7] arm64: ftrace: Add CALLER_ADDRx macros
Hi Will,
On 04/16/2014 10:52 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 05:45:52AM +0000, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>> CALLER_ADDRx returns caller's address at specified level in call stacks.
>> They are used for several tracers like irqsoff and preemptoff.
>> Strange to say, however, they are refered even without FTRACE.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h | 13 ++++++++-
>> arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile | 3 ++-
>> arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
>> index ed5c448..c44c4b1 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>>
>> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>> extern void _mcount(unsigned long);
>> +extern void *return_address(unsigned int);
>>
>> struct dyn_arch_ftrace {
>> /* No extra data needed for arm64 */
>> @@ -33,6 +34,16 @@ static inline unsigned long ftrace_call_adjust(unsigned long addr)
>> */
>> return addr;
>> }
>> -#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>> +
>> +#define HAVE_ARCH_CALLER_ADDR
>> +
>> +#define CALLER_ADDR0 ((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0))
>> +#define CALLER_ADDR1 ((unsigned long)return_address(1))
>> +#define CALLER_ADDR2 ((unsigned long)return_address(2))
>> +#define CALLER_ADDR3 ((unsigned long)return_address(3))
>> +#define CALLER_ADDR4 ((unsigned long)return_address(4))
>> +#define CALLER_ADDR5 ((unsigned long)return_address(5))
>> +#define CALLER_ADDR6 ((unsigned long)return_address(6))
>> +#endif /* ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ */
>
> Hmm, I thought you were going to take a look at reworking the core code for
> this, as Steve and I suggested?
>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-March/240239.html
Sorry that I've forgot to submit a new revision with this change.
I will post it soon.
Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI
> Will
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists