[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140428204620.01c102c2@notabene.brown>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:46:20 +1000
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Cc: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
"Stefan (metze) Metzmacher" <metze@...ba.org>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, samba-technical@...ts.samba.org,
Ganesha NFS List <nfs-ganesha-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@...hat.com>,
libc-alpha <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locks: rename file-private locks to file-description
locks
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 06:23:21 -0400 Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com> wrote:
> I sent a pull request to Linus last week and he merged the patches over
> the weekend. So yes, this ship has sailed unless someone feels strongly
> enough about it to roll up the patches to change it.
>
> I think we'll probably come to know these as "O.F.D. locks" over the long
> run. Not a wonderful name, but I can live with it.
I've managed to train my brain that "of_" means "device tree". Coping with
"ofd" meaning "per-open" should be too hard.
:-)
NeilBrown
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists