lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:24:20 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf tools: Cache register accesses for unwind
 processing

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:02:55PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
> 
> 2014-04-28 (월), 11:48 +0200, Jiri Olsa:
> > On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:29:21PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > Hi Jiri,
> > > 
> > > 2014-04-17 (목), 19:39 +0200, Jiri Olsa:
> > > > Caching registers value into an array. Got about 4% speed up
> > > > of perf_reg_value function for report command processing
> > > > dwarf unwind stacks.
> > > 
> > > I'm not familiar with the code base, so probably silly questions:  Where
> > > does the speed up come from?  IOW I don't know what's the difference
> > > between the regs->regs and regs->cached_regs.  And does the cached_regs
> > > contain correct values of registers for each frame?
> > 
> > the current way register's value is accessed is to get its
> > index in the sample's regs array.. based on register's id
> > and the registers mask
> > 
> > so each time you want register value you traverse the registers
> > mask and count reg's index for the sample regs array
> > 
> > this patch does this only once for each register (at the time it's
> > first accessed) and cache its value in the array (cache_regs). The
> > cache_mask is used to identify which regs are already cached.
> 
> That means it'll get the same value everytime it accesses a register in
> frames in a sample?

right..

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ