[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1398703421.24318.262.camel@ul30vt.home>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:43:41 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Antonios Motakis <a.motakis@...tualopensystems.com>
Cc: kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
tech@...tualopensystems.com, a.rigo@...tualopensystems.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, christoffer.dall@...aro.org,
will.deacon@....com, kim.phillips@...escale.com,
stuart.yoder@...escale.com,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 03/11] VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1 for platform bus devices
on ARM
On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 17:52 +0200, Antonios Motakis wrote:
> This allows to make use of the VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1 driver with platform
> devices on ARM in addition to PCI. This is required in order to use the
> Exynos SMMU, or ARM SMMU driver with VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Antonios Motakis <a.motakis@...tualopensystems.com>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 5 ++++-
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/Kconfig b/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
> index af7b204..3a598ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ config VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE
> menuconfig VFIO
> tristate "VFIO Non-Privileged userspace driver framework"
> depends on IOMMU_API
> - select VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1 if X86
> + select VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1 if X86 || ARM
> select VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE if (PPC_POWERNV || PPC_PSERIES)
> select ANON_INODES
> help
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index 1f90344..4dc989d 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> #include <linux/iommu.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h> /* pci_bus_type */
> #include <linux/rbtree.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> @@ -721,13 +722,15 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&domain->group_list);
> list_add(&group->next, &domain->group_list);
>
> - if (!allow_unsafe_interrupts &&
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
> + if (bus == &pci_bus_type && !allow_unsafe_interrupts &&
> !iommu_domain_has_cap(domain->domain, IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP)) {
> pr_warn("%s: No interrupt remapping support. Use the module param \"allow_unsafe_interrupts\" to enable VFIO IOMMU support on this platform\n",
> __func__);
> ret = -EPERM;
> goto out_detach;
> }
> +#endif
>
> if (iommu_domain_has_cap(domain->domain, IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY))
> domain->prot |= IOMMU_CACHE;
This is not a PCI specific requirement. Anything that can support MSI
needs an IOMMU that can provide isolation for both DMA and interrupts.
I think the IOMMU should still be telling us that it has this feature.
Thanks,
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists