[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140428183107.GE17778@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:31:07 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: "Shevchenko, Andriy" <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: lockdep warning after recent cleanup in console code
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 01:43:31PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> Peter,
>
> Things have changed with regard to printk() in linux-next. Now it
> appears that lockdep is going haywire over it. I don't understand the
> exact reason for the lockdep_off() and lockdep_on() logic that is in
> printk(), but it obviously seems to be causing issues with the new
> changes.
>
> Care to take a look?
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/21/247
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists