[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140428185418.28755.68864.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:24:27 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: rjw@...ysocki.net, mroos@...ux.ee, viresh.kumar@...aro.org
Cc: cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] cpufreq,
powernow-k6: Fix incorrect comparison with max_multipler
The value of 'max_multiplier' is meant to be used for comparison with
clock_ratio[index].driver_data, not the index itself! Fix the code in
powernow_k6_cpu_exit() that has this bug.
Also, while at it, make the for-loop condition look for CPUFREQ_TABLE_END,
instead of hard-coding the loop count to 8.
Reported-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c
index 49f120e..695a68c 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c
@@ -227,8 +227,9 @@ have_busfreq:
static int powernow_k6_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
unsigned int i;
- for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
- if (i == max_multiplier)
+
+ for (i = 0; (clock_ratio[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END); i++) {
+ if (clock_ratio[i].driver_data == max_multiplier)
powernow_k6_target(policy, i);
}
return 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists