[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANGgnMavy-W8UXosgBrLkSLU=rYvU36OJCE0qgZQ4N6iSdN82A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:20:58 -0700
From: Austin Schuh <austin@...oton-tech.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
Pavel Pisa <pisa@....felk.cvut.cz>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: Sanitize spurious interrupt detection of threaded irqs
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Austin Schuh <austin@...oton-tech.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>> On Mon, 7 Apr 2014, Austin Schuh wrote:
>>> You originally sent the patch out. I could send your patch out back
>>> to you, but that feels a bit weird ;)
>>
>> Wheee. Let me dig in my archives ....
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/7/222 in case that helps.
Did you find the patch? I didn't see anything go by (but I'm not on
the main mailing list and didn't find anything with a quick Google
search.) It would be nice to not need to run a custom kernel to keep
my machine running. I have what is probably a year split between 2
machines of runtime with the patch applied, and I haven't seen any
problems with it.
Austin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists