linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] MM: make vmpressure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140428141025.e8f7604535b4d840a6eeacea@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:10:25 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] MM: make vmpressure_win dynamic

On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 22:25:21 +0200 Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be> wrote:

> Initialize vmpressure_win in vmstat using
> calculate_normal_threshold() based on each zone/cpu * SWAP_CLUSTER_SIZE
> 
> Value refreshed through cpu notifier

Anton wrote vmpressure so please let's cc him.  `git blame' is useful
for working out who to cc.

What were the reasons for this change?  Any testing results?

> --- a/mm/vmstat.c
> +++ b/mm/vmstat.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,23 @@
>  
>  #include "internal.h"
>  
> +/*
> + * The window size (vmpressure_win) is the number of scanned pages before
> + * we try to analyze scanned/reclaimed ratio. So the window is used as a
> + * rate-limit tunable for the "low" level notification, and also for
> + * averaging the ratio for medium/critical levels. Using small window
> + * sizes can cause lot of false positives, but too big window size will
> + * delay the notifications.
> + *
> + * As the vmscan reclaimer logic works with chunks which are multiple of
> + * SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, it makes sense to use it for the window size as well.
> + *
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(vmpressure_win_lock);
> +unsigned long vmpressure_win __read_mostly = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX * 16;
> +#endif
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_VM_EVENT_COUNTERS
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct vm_event_state, vm_event_states) = {{0}};
>  EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(vm_event_states);
> @@ -163,11 +180,13 @@ void refresh_zone_stat_thresholds(void)
>  	struct zone *zone;
>  	int cpu;
>  	int threshold;
> +	unsigned long new_vmpressure_win = 0;
>  
>  	for_each_populated_zone(zone) {
>  		unsigned long max_drift, tolerate_drift;
>  
>  		threshold = calculate_normal_threshold(zone);
> +		new_vmpressure_win += threshold;
>  
>  		for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
>  			per_cpu_ptr(zone->pageset, cpu)->stat_threshold
> @@ -184,6 +203,11 @@ void refresh_zone_stat_thresholds(void)
>  			zone->percpu_drift_mark = high_wmark_pages(zone) +
>  					max_drift;
>  	}
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> +	spin_lock(&vmpressure_win_lock);
> +	vmpressure_win = new_vmpressure_win * SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX;
> +	spin_unlock(&vmpressure_win_lock);
> +#endif
>  }

I don't think we need the spinlock really.  It's a ulong - concurrent
readers will see either the old value or the new one whether or not the
writer took that lock.

If we're going to modify this thing on the fly then we probably should
expose the current value to userspace in some fashion.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/