linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] kernel BUG at mm/vmacache.c:85!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1404281500180.2861@eggly.anvils>
Date:	Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] kernel BUG at mm/vmacache.c:85!

On Mon, 28 Apr 2014, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > That said, the bug does seem to be that some path doesn't invalidate
> > the vmacache sufficiently, or something inserts a vmacache entry into
> > the current process when looking up a remote process or whatever.
> > Davidlohr, ideas?
> 
> Maybe we missed some use_mm() call. That will change the current mm
> without flushing the vma cache. The code considers kernel threads to
> be bad targets for vma caching for this reason (and perhaps others),
> but maybe we missed something.
> 
> I wonder if we should just invalidate the vma cache in use_mm(), and
> remote the "kernel tasks are special" check.
> 
> Srivatsa, are you doing something peculiar on that system that would
> trigger this? I see some kdump failures in the log, anything else?

I doubt that the vmacache has anything to do with the real problem
(though it *might* suggest that vmacache is less robust than what
it replaced - maybe).  The log is so full of userspace SIGSEGVs
and General Protection faults, it looks like userspace was utterly
broken by some kernel bug messing up the address space.

Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/