[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140428220928.GA19838@google.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:09:28 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 28 (drivers/pnp/quirks.c)
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:14:15PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On 4/28/2014 11:11 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:45:37AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >>On 04/27/14 23:57, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>>Hi all,
> >>>
> >>>This tree still fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build.
> >>>
> >>>Changes since 20140424:
> >>>
> >>on i386:
> >>
> >> CC drivers/pnp/quirks.o
> >>drivers/pnp/quirks.c: In function 'quirk_intel_mch':
> >>drivers/pnp/quirks.c:393:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'pcibios_bus_to_resource' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >>cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> >>make[3]: *** [drivers/pnp/quirks.o] Error 1
> >Thanks Randy. This is a config that doesn't define CONFIG_PCI. Rafael,
> >here's an incremental fix, or the full updated patch is below.
>
> Well, that went to Linus already, so a fix on top of 3.15-rc3 is needed.
Of course; I should have noticed that.
> >+#if defined(CONFIG_X86) && defined(CONFIG_PCI)
>
> Do we need both or would CONFIG_PCI be sufficient?
CONFIG_PCI alone should be sufficient. Here's a fix on top of
v3.15-rc3. Sorry for all the hassle.
commit c03ae9359c7f97854567f897bafcb2e6489d155f
Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Date: Thu Apr 17 14:22:18 2014 -0600
PNP: Fix compile error
Fix the compile error:
drivers/pnp/quirks.c:393:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'pcibios_bus_to_resource'
that occurs when building with CONFIG_PCI unset. The quirk is only
relevent to Intel devices, so we could use "#if defined(CONFIG_X86) &&
defined(CONFIG_PCI)" instead, but testing CONFIG_X86 is not strictly
necessary.
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
diff --git a/drivers/pnp/quirks.c b/drivers/pnp/quirks.c
index 3736bc408adb..ebf0d6710b5a 100644
--- a/drivers/pnp/quirks.c
+++ b/drivers/pnp/quirks.c
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ static void quirk_amd_mmconfig_area(struct pnp_dev *dev)
}
#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86
+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
/* Device IDs of parts that have 32KB MCH space */
static const unsigned int mch_quirk_devices[] = {
0x0154, /* Ivy Bridge */
@@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ static struct pnp_fixup pnp_fixups[] = {
#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_NB
{"PNP0c01", quirk_amd_mmconfig_area},
#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86
+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
{"PNP0c02", quirk_intel_mch},
#endif
{""}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists