| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:59:21 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
arm@...nel.org, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
lm-sensors@...sensors.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] hwmon: vexpress: Use devm helper for hwmon device
registration
On 04/28/2014 10:57 AM, Pawel Moll wrote:
> Use devm_hwmon_device_register_with_groups instead of
> the old-style manual attributes and hwmon device registration.
>
> Also, unwind the attribute group macros for better code
> readability.
>
> Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> Cc: lm-sensors@...sensors.org
> Signed-off-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/vexpress.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/vexpress.c b/drivers/hwmon/vexpress.c
> index d853332..ed6bf0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/vexpress.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/vexpress.c
> @@ -27,17 +27,8 @@
> struct vexpress_hwmon_data {
> struct device *hwmon_dev;
> struct regmap *reg;
> - const char *name;
> };
>
> -static ssize_t vexpress_hwmon_name_show(struct device *dev,
> - struct device_attribute *dev_attr, char *buffer)
> -{
> - struct vexpress_hwmon_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> -
> - return sprintf(buffer, "%s\n", data->name);
> -}
> -
> static ssize_t vexpress_hwmon_label_show(struct device *dev,
> struct device_attribute *dev_attr, char *buffer)
> {
> @@ -95,16 +86,6 @@ static umode_t vexpress_hwmon_attr_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
> return attr->mode;
> }
>
> -static DEVICE_ATTR(name, S_IRUGO, vexpress_hwmon_name_show, NULL);
> -
> -#define VEXPRESS_HWMON_ATTRS(_name, _label_attr, _input_attr) \
> -struct attribute *vexpress_hwmon_attrs_##_name[] = { \
> - &dev_attr_name.attr, \
> - &dev_attr_##_label_attr.attr, \
> - &sensor_dev_attr_##_input_attr.dev_attr.attr, \
> - NULL \
> -}
> -
> struct vexpress_hwmon_type {
> const char *name;
> const struct attribute_group **attr_groups;
> @@ -114,10 +95,13 @@ struct vexpress_hwmon_type {
> static DEVICE_ATTR(in1_label, S_IRUGO, vexpress_hwmon_label_show, NULL);
> static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(in1_input, S_IRUGO, vexpress_hwmon_u32_show,
> NULL, 1000);
> -static VEXPRESS_HWMON_ATTRS(volt, in1_label, in1_input);
> static struct attribute_group vexpress_hwmon_group_volt = {
> .is_visible = vexpress_hwmon_attr_is_visible,
> - .attrs = vexpress_hwmon_attrs_volt,
> + .attrs = (struct attribute *[]) {
Is this typecast necessary ?
> + &dev_attr_in1_label.attr,
> + &sensor_dev_attr_in1_input.dev_attr.attr,
> + NULL
> + },
> };
> static struct vexpress_hwmon_type vexpress_hwmon_volt = {
> .name = "vexpress_volt",
> @@ -131,10 +115,13 @@ static struct vexpress_hwmon_type vexpress_hwmon_volt = {
> static DEVICE_ATTR(curr1_label, S_IRUGO, vexpress_hwmon_label_show, NULL);
> static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(curr1_input, S_IRUGO, vexpress_hwmon_u32_show,
> NULL, 1000);
> -static VEXPRESS_HWMON_ATTRS(amp, curr1_label, curr1_input);
> static struct attribute_group vexpress_hwmon_group_amp = {
> .is_visible = vexpress_hwmon_attr_is_visible,
> - .attrs = vexpress_hwmon_attrs_amp,
> + .attrs = (struct attribute *[]) {
> + &dev_attr_curr1_label.attr,
> + &sensor_dev_attr_curr1_input.dev_attr.attr,
> + NULL
> + },
> };
> static struct vexpress_hwmon_type vexpress_hwmon_amp = {
> .name = "vexpress_amp",
> @@ -147,10 +134,13 @@ static struct vexpress_hwmon_type vexpress_hwmon_amp = {
> static DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_label, S_IRUGO, vexpress_hwmon_label_show, NULL);
> static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_input, S_IRUGO, vexpress_hwmon_u32_show,
> NULL, 1000);
> -static VEXPRESS_HWMON_ATTRS(temp, temp1_label, temp1_input);
> static struct attribute_group vexpress_hwmon_group_temp = {
> .is_visible = vexpress_hwmon_attr_is_visible,
> - .attrs = vexpress_hwmon_attrs_temp,
> + .attrs = (struct attribute *[]) {
> + &dev_attr_temp1_label.attr,
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp1_input.dev_attr.attr,
> + NULL
> + },
> };
> static struct vexpress_hwmon_type vexpress_hwmon_temp = {
> .name = "vexpress_temp",
> @@ -163,10 +153,13 @@ static struct vexpress_hwmon_type vexpress_hwmon_temp = {
> static DEVICE_ATTR(power1_label, S_IRUGO, vexpress_hwmon_label_show, NULL);
> static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(power1_input, S_IRUGO, vexpress_hwmon_u32_show,
> NULL, 1);
> -static VEXPRESS_HWMON_ATTRS(power, power1_label, power1_input);
> static struct attribute_group vexpress_hwmon_group_power = {
> .is_visible = vexpress_hwmon_attr_is_visible,
> - .attrs = vexpress_hwmon_attrs_power,
> + .attrs = (struct attribute *[]) {
> + &dev_attr_power1_label.attr,
> + &sensor_dev_attr_power1_input.dev_attr.attr,
> + NULL
> + },
> };
> static struct vexpress_hwmon_type vexpress_hwmon_power = {
> .name = "vexpress_power",
> @@ -179,10 +172,13 @@ static struct vexpress_hwmon_type vexpress_hwmon_power = {
> static DEVICE_ATTR(energy1_label, S_IRUGO, vexpress_hwmon_label_show, NULL);
> static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(energy1_input, S_IRUGO, vexpress_hwmon_u64_show,
> NULL, 1);
> -static VEXPRESS_HWMON_ATTRS(energy, energy1_label, energy1_input);
> static struct attribute_group vexpress_hwmon_group_energy = {
> .is_visible = vexpress_hwmon_attr_is_visible,
> - .attrs = vexpress_hwmon_attrs_energy,
> + .attrs = (struct attribute *[]) {
> + &dev_attr_energy1_label.attr,
> + &sensor_dev_attr_energy1_input.dev_attr.attr,
> + NULL
> + },
> };
> static struct vexpress_hwmon_type vexpress_hwmon_energy = {
> .name = "vexpress_energy",
> @@ -218,7 +214,6 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, vexpress_hwmon_of_match);
>
> static int vexpress_hwmon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - int err;
> const struct of_device_id *match;
> struct vexpress_hwmon_data *data;
> const struct vexpress_hwmon_type *type;
> @@ -232,45 +227,19 @@ static int vexpress_hwmon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!match)
> return -ENODEV;
> type = match->data;
> - data->name = type->name;
>
> data->reg = devm_regmap_init_vexpress_config(&pdev->dev);
> - if (!data->reg)
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> - err = sysfs_create_groups(&pdev->dev.kobj, type->attr_groups);
> - if (err)
> - goto error;
> -
> - data->hwmon_dev = hwmon_device_register(&pdev->dev);
> - if (IS_ERR(data->hwmon_dev)) {
> - err = PTR_ERR(data->hwmon_dev);
> - goto error;
> - }
> + if (IS_ERR(data->reg))
> + return PTR_ERR(data->reg);
Did the API for devm_regmap_init_vexpress_config change ?
If so, it might make sense to separate this out into a separate patch,
together with the API change (it is a logically different change).
Otherwise looks good.
One question - I seem to be unable to apply the patch. What is your baseline branch / repository ?
Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists