linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] usb: xhci: Correct last context entry calculation for Configure Endpoint

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:11:27 -0700
From:	Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>
To:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:	Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>,
	Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@...omium.org>,
	Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>,
	Jim Lin <jilin@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: xhci: Correct last context entry calculation for
 Configure Endpoint

*bump*

Sarah, Mathias, can we decide how to proceed with this? I think the
section Alan quoted is a pretty good argument in favor of my
interpretation (although of course this would not be the first time
that two sections of a spec contradict each other). But more
importantly, we have a case that just generates a clearly wrong Slot
Context right now (the one that only drops endpoints), and I see no
way how you could construct a correct Slot Context for that case with
Sarah's interpretation. We need to resolve that somehow.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/