linux-kernel - linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140429171321.69409c76a15ad2a97761585c@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:13:21 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>,
	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree

Hi Andrew,

After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
failed like this:

arch/sparc/kernel/process_64.c: In function 'arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace':
arch/sparc/kernel/process_64.c:267:3: error: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Werror=declaration-after-statement]
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

Caused by commit dd0063a16aa1 ("nmi: provide the option to issue an NMI
back trace to every cpu but current").

I have no idea why I did not see this yesterday.

I applied the following fix up patch:

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:10:00 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] nmi-provide-the-option-to-issue-an-nmi-back-trace-to-every-cpu-but-current-fix

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
---
 arch/sparc/kernel/process_64.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/process_64.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/process_64.c
index 65b405c36421..9975a6dbca0a 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/process_64.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/process_64.c
@@ -261,10 +261,12 @@ void arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(bool include_self)
 	smp_fetch_global_regs();
 
 	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+		struct global_reg_snapshot *gp;
+
 		if (!include_self && cpu == this_cpu)
 			continue;
 
-		struct global_reg_snapshot *gp = &global_cpu_snapshot[cpu].reg;
+		gp = &global_cpu_snapshot[cpu].reg;
 
 		__global_reg_poll(gp);
 
-- 
2.0.0.rc0

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped