[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140429080240.GC29462@lee--X1>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 09:02:40 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: micky_ching@...lsil.com.cn
Cc: chris@...ntf.net, ulf.hansson@...aro.org, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
devel@...uxdriverproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, rogerable@...ltek.com,
wei_wang@...lsil.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mmc: rtsx: revert support for mmc async request
> From: Micky Ching <micky_ching@...lsil.com.cn>
>
> The commit <mmc: rtsx: add support for pre_req and post_req> have some problem,
> using mutex_unlock() in atomic context, spinlock deadlock, it is hard to fix
> these problem, and better to use a new method. So just remove it.
>
> The commit <mmc: rtsx: modify error handle and remove smatch warnings> depends
> on the previous patch. And mainly fix some problem for the previous patch. So
> need remove.
>
> Micky Ching (2):
> mmc: rtsx: Revert "mmc: rtsx: modify error handle and remove smatch
> warnings"
> mmc: rtsx: Revert "mmc: rtsx: add support for pre_req and post_req"
>
> drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.c | 132 ++++-------
> drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c | 459 +++++++------------------------------
> include/linux/mfd/rtsx_common.h | 1 -
> include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h | 6 -
> 4 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 474 deletions(-)
Just to clarify, what commit did you base these changes on? Have you
tested to ensure everything works as it should with these two
reversions?
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists