[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140428141439.3580dce9@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:14:39 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Shevchenko, Andriy" <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: lockdep warning after recent cleanup in console code
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 19:51:39 +0200
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
> On Mon 28-04-14 13:43:31, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Things have changed with regard to printk() in linux-next. Now it
> > appears that lockdep is going haywire over it. I don't understand the
> > exact reason for the lockdep_off() and lockdep_on() logic that is in
> > printk(), but it obviously seems to be causing issues with the new
> > changes.
> >
> > Care to take a look?
> The obvious cause is that I moved lockdep_on() somewhat earlier in
> vprintk_emit() so lockdep now covers more of printk code. And apparently
> something is wrong there...
>
Exactly, and I rather know *exactly* what is wrong before we just start
throwing patches at the problem and hope it goes away. That's not how
to solve a software bug.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists