[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140429100437.GA3269@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:34:37 +0530
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <aarapov@...hat.com>,
David Long <dave.long@...aro.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
Jonathan Lebon <jlebon@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] uprobes/x86: Add uprobe_init_insn(), kill
validate_insn_{32,64}bits()
* Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> [2014-04-19 19:01:47]:
> validate_insn_32bits() and validate_insn_64bits() are very similar,
> turn them into the single uprobe_init_insn() which has the additional
> "bool x86_64" argument which can be passed to insn_init() and used to
> choose between good_insns_64/good_insns_32.
>
> Also kill UPROBE_FIX_NONE, it has no users.
>
> Note: the current code doesn't use ifdef's consistently, good_insns_64
> depends on CONFIG_X86_64 but good_insns_32 is unconditional. This patch
> removes ifdef around good_insns_64, we will add it back later along with
> the similar one for good_insns_32.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists