[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140429102013.GA4726@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:20:13 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@...glemail.com>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...il.com>,
Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>,
Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@....com>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, kim.naru@....com,
Daniel J Blueman <daniel@...ascale.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
Steffen Persvold <sp@...ascale.com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] x86/PCI: Support additional MMIO range
capabilities
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 09:33:09AM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> I am sure, it's because some server systems had MMIO ECS access not
> enabled in BIOS. I can't remember which systems were affected.
Ok, now AMD people: what's the story with IO ECS, can we assume that on
everything after F10h, BIOS has a sensible MCFG and we can limit this to
F10h only? I like Bjorn's idea but we need to make sure a working MCFG
is ubiquitous.
Which begs the real question: Suravee, why are you even touching IO ECS
provided F15h and later have a MCFG? Or, do they?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists