[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140429113747.GD1148@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:37:47 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] perf record: Propagate exit status of a command
line workload
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 01:19:39PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:56:54PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >
> > perf_counter tools: Propagate signals properly
> > commit f7b7c26e01e51fe46097e11f179dc71ce7950084
> > Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> > Date: Wed Jun 10 15:55:59 2009 +0200
> >
> > but I dont think we need to do that
>
> But but but, then you're re-introducing that fail again? That no good.
well, I was trying the testcase you mentioned in the changelog
and it seemed to work for me.. ;-) I guess I was lucky to hit
the bash time window..
while :; do perf stat ./foo ; done
so how does this work? bash will kill the loop if perf's wait
status is WIFSIGNALED?
thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists