[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140429075046.39fc9c3f@tlielax.poochiereds.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 07:50:46 -0400
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>
To: "Matt W. Benjamin" <matt@...uxbox.com>
Cc: Ganesha NFS List <nfs-ganesha-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, samba-technical@...ts.samba.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
"Frank Filz" <ffilzlnx@...dspring.com>
Subject: Re: OFD ("file private") locks and NFS
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 07:40:08 -0400 (EDT)
"Matt W. Benjamin" <matt@...uxbox.com> wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Something which came up on the last Ganesha conn call is that we have
> a pretty strong need for some ability to wait on a set of locks, and perhaps
> receive events. Frank Filz believed that you had made a proposal which
> would cover this. Can you elaborate on that?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
No, there's no mechanism to wait on a set of locks from within the
context of a single thread of execution or to receive "events". Again,
that would be a new API beyond what I've been proposing over the last
several months.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists