[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140429153401.GK32718@rric.localhost>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:34:01 +0200
From: Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/16] perf, mmap: Factor out perf_get_fd()
On 25.04.14 16:52:05, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> But no, I don't think that helps, its still true that the moment you get
> a fd another thread can immediately close(). That would drop the last
> ref and free it, meanwhile perf_event_open() is happily poking at it.
>
> Now I think you could cure this by adding an extra ref before calling
> your perf_get_fd() and dropping that extra ref at the end, where we used
> to have fd_install().
Yes, right. I have a solution now which increments the event's ref
count before creating the file descriptor using try_get_event()/
put_event().
The patch also does not remove get_unused_fd_flags() and the err_fd
error handler.
Have an update already of a rebase version but still need to test it.
Would it be ok to split the patch set and send in a first step only
the first 4 patches that refactor the perf mmap code?
Thanks,
-Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists