lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:51:33 +0200
From:	Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@...hat.com>
To:	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	JBottomley@...allels.com, hch@....de, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	kmo@...erainc.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	m.lombardi85@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH V2] bio: modify __bio_add_page() to accept pages that don't start a new segment

The original behaviour is to refuse to add a new page if the maximum number
of segments has been reached, regardless of the fact the page we are
going to add can be merged into the last segment or not.

Unfortunately, when the system runs under heavy memory fragmentation conditions,
a driver may try to add multiple pages to the last segment.
The original code won't accept them and EBUSY will be reported to
userspace.

This patch modifies the function so it refuses to add a page
only in case the latter starts a new segment and the maximum number
of segments has already been reached.

The bug can be easily reproduced with the st driver:

1) set CONFIG_SCSI_MPT2SAS_MAX_SGE or CONFIG_SCSI_MPT3SAS_MAX_SGE  to 16
2) modprobe st buffer_kbs=1024
3) #dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/st0 bs=1M count=10
   dd: error writing ‘/dev/st0’: Device or resource busy

Signed-off-by: Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@...hat.com>
---
 fs/bio.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/bio.c b/fs/bio.c
index 6f0362b..a31e12b 100644
--- a/fs/bio.c
+++ b/fs/bio.c
@@ -699,6 +699,7 @@ static int __bio_add_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, struct page
 			  unsigned int max_sectors)
 {
 	int retried_segments = 0;
+	unsigned int bi_phys_segments_orig;
 	struct bio_vec *bvec;
 
 	/*
@@ -750,29 +751,32 @@ static int __bio_add_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, struct page
 		return 0;
 
 	/*
-	 * we might lose a segment or two here, but rather that than
-	 * make this too complex.
+	 * setup the new entry, we might clear it again later if we
+	 * cannot add the page
+	 */
+	bvec = &bio->bi_io_vec[bio->bi_vcnt];
+	bvec->bv_page = page;
+	bvec->bv_len = len;
+	bvec->bv_offset = offset;
+	bio->bi_vcnt++;
+	bi_phys_segments_orig = bio->bi_phys_segments;
+	bio->bi_phys_segments++;
+
+	/*
+	 * Perform a recount if the number of segments is greater
+	 * than queue_max_segments(q).
 	 */
 
-	while (bio->bi_phys_segments >= queue_max_segments(q)) {
+	while (bio->bi_phys_segments > queue_max_segments(q)) {
 
 		if (retried_segments)
-			return 0;
+			goto failed;
 
 		retried_segments = 1;
 		blk_recount_segments(q, bio);
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * setup the new entry, we might clear it again later if we
-	 * cannot add the page
-	 */
-	bvec = &bio->bi_io_vec[bio->bi_vcnt];
-	bvec->bv_page = page;
-	bvec->bv_len = len;
-	bvec->bv_offset = offset;
-
-	/*
 	 * if queue has other restrictions (eg varying max sector size
 	 * depending on offset), it can specify a merge_bvec_fn in the
 	 * queue to get further control
@@ -789,23 +793,26 @@ static int __bio_add_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, struct page
 		 * merge_bvec_fn() returns number of bytes it can accept
 		 * at this offset
 		 */
-		if (q->merge_bvec_fn(q, &bvm, bvec) < bvec->bv_len) {
-			bvec->bv_page = NULL;
-			bvec->bv_len = 0;
-			bvec->bv_offset = 0;
-			return 0;
-		}
+		if (q->merge_bvec_fn(q, &bvm, bvec) < bvec->bv_len)
+			goto failed;
 	}
 
 	/* If we may be able to merge these biovecs, force a recount */
-	if (bio->bi_vcnt && (BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE(bvec-1, bvec)))
+	if (bio->bi_vcnt > 1 && (BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE(bvec-1, bvec)))
 		bio->bi_flags &= ~(1 << BIO_SEG_VALID);
 
-	bio->bi_vcnt++;
-	bio->bi_phys_segments++;
  done:
 	bio->bi_iter.bi_size += len;
 	return len;
+
+ failed:
+	bvec->bv_page = NULL;
+	bvec->bv_len = 0;
+	bvec->bv_offset = 0;
+	bio->bi_vcnt--;
+	bio->bi_phys_segments = bi_phys_segments_orig;
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /**
-- 
Maurizio Lombardi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ