[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140429190200.GD22062@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 21:02:01 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] devicetree: bindings: Document Krait cache error
interrupts
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:34:00AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in replying. Those cache bindings need an ACK
> to get merged, and were introduced so that idle states can retrieve
> power domain information for caches. I am going to revive the idle
> bindings thread to see what we can/should merge of these bindings as
> things stand, I really hope this won't block the series any further,
> otherwise we can rework the patches so that this series can get in
> first, or simplify my series to allow both to get merged as soon as
> possible without compromising future requirements.
Right, I think this is Stephen's call. AFAIR, the current state of
affairs is for a followup patchset to come up which I can ack for the
EDAC bits and then another maintainer picks the whole thing up.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists