[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140429191603.GC4726@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 21:16:03 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...il.com>
Cc: Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@....com>,
kim.naru@....com, daniel@...ascale.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, x86 <x86@...nel.org>, sp@...ascale.com,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] ACPI/PCI: Warn if we have to "guess" host bridge
node information
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 03:24:39PM -0600, Myron Stowe wrote:
> >> @@ -489,8 +489,12 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
> >> }
> >>
> >> node = acpi_get_node(device->handle);
> >> - if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> >> + if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
> >> node = x86_pci_root_bus_node(busnum);
> >> + if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE)
> >> + dev_info(&device->dev, FW_BUG "No _PXM; guessing node number %x\n",
> >
> > Hmm, I'm not really convinced this message is user-friendly enough. Can
> > we be more descriptive here please?
> >
>
> How about -
> dev_info(&device->dev, FW_BUG "no _PXM; falling back to node %d from
> hardware (may be inconsistent with ACPI node numbers)\n", node);
Yep, better.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists