linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] ARM: EXYNOS: Make exynos machine

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <5360A7C8.1080407@samsung.com>
Date:	Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:35:36 +0900
From:	Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>
To:	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>, chow.kim@...sung.com,
	Young-Gun Jang <yg1004.jang@...sung.com>,
	VIKAS SAJJANC <vikas.sajjan@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] ARM: EXYNOS: Make exynos machine_ops as static

Hi Sachin,

On 04/30/2014 03:00 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Hi Pankaj,
>
> On 30 April 2014 10:47, Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com> wrote:
>> As machine function ops are used only in this file let's make
>> them static.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c |    6 +++---
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
>> index 3d69e8d..06dcce5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
>> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static struct map_desc exynos5_iodesc[] __initdata = {
>>          },
>>   };
>>
>> -void exynos_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
>> +static void exynos_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
>>   {
>>          struct device_node *np;
>>          u32 val = 0x1;
>> @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ void __init exynos_cpufreq_init(void)
>>          platform_device_register_simple("exynos-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
>>   }
>>
>> -void __init exynos_init_late(void)
>> +static void __init exynos_init_late(void)
>>   {
>>          if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5440"))
>>                  /* to be supported later */
>> @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static void __init exynos_map_io(void)
>>                  iotable_init(exynos5250_iodesc, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_iodesc));
>>   }
>>
>> -void __init exynos_init_io(void)
>> +static void __init exynos_init_io(void)
>>   {
>>          debug_ll_io_init();
>
> The declarations from common.h should also be removed in this patch to
> avoid the below
> build errors:

Thanks. I will merge changes in common.h in this patch itself.

>
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c:198:13: error: static declaration of
> ‘exynos_restart’ follows non-static declaration
>   static void exynos_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
>               ^
> In file included from arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c:31:0:
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h:22:6: note: previous declaration of
> ‘exynos_restart’ was here
>   void exynos_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd);
>        ^
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c:235:20: error: static declaration of
> ‘exynos_init_late’ follows non-static declaration
>   static void __init exynos_init_late(void)
>                      ^
> In file included from arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c:31:0:
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h:25:6: note: previous declaration of
> ‘exynos_init_late’ was here
>   void exynos_init_late(void);
>        ^
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c:296:20: error: static declaration of
> ‘exynos_init_io’ follows non-static declaration
>   static void __init exynos_init_io(void)
>                      ^
> In file included from arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c:31:0:
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h:21:6: note: previous declaration of
> ‘exynos_init_io’ was here
>   void exynos_init_io(void);
>
>


-- 
Best Regards,
Pankaj Dubey

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/