linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.14-rt1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1398843793.26071.52.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date:	Wed, 30 Apr 2014 09:43:13 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
	Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.14-rt1

On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 20:13 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: 
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 07:21:09 +0200
> Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 16:37 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: 
> > 
> > > > Seems that migrate_disable() must be called before taking the lock as
> > > > it is done in every other location.
> > > 
> > > And for tasklist_lock, seems you also MUST do that prior to trylock as
> > > well, else you'll run afoul of the hotplug beast.
> > 
> > Bah.  Futzing with dmesg while stress script is running is either a very
> > bad idea, or a very good test.  Both virgin 3.10-rt and 3.12-rt with new
> > bugs squashed will deadlock.
> > 
> > Too bad I kept on testing, I liked the notion that hotplug was solid ;-)
> 
> I was able to stress cpu hotplug on 3.12-rt after applying the
> following patch.
> 
> If there's no complaints about it. I'm going to add this to the 3.12-rt
> stable tree. As without it, it fails horribly with the cpu hotplug
> stress test, and I wont release a stable kernel that does that.

My local boxen are happy, 64 core box with 14-rt seems happy as well,
though I couldn't let it burn for long.

BTW, that dmesg business went into hiding.  I didn't have time to put
virgin 10-rt back on and play around poking both kernels this that and
the other way again, but seems there's some phase-of-moon factor there.

-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/