[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwTKzSgt2fk8gYbA67hfEWV6_a18Dfhw2D9jzHzs2GSEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:57:11 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andrew Lutomriski <amluto@...il.com>,
Dirk Hohndel <dirk@...ndel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
comex <comexk@...il.com>,
Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64, espfix: Don't leak bits 31:16 of %esp returning
to 16-bit stack
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:15 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> Linus, this is technically a (functionality) regression fix. Will you
> want this for 3.15?
Too scary. If people complain, I think we should just replace the
if (!ldt_info.seg_32bit) {
with something like
if (!ldt_info.seg_32bit && !sysctl_allow_16bit_segments) {
and handle the regression that way.
Then, after way more testing, maybe we can backport the espfix thing.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists