[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140430102244.GK29462@lee--X1>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:22:44 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: "Gupta, Pekon" <pekon@...com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel@...inux.com" <kernel@...inux.com>,
"computersforpeace@...il.com" <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"angus.clark@...com" <angus.clark@...com>,
"Ezequiel Garcia (ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com)"
<ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 07/47] mtd: nand: stm_nand_bch: initialise the BCH
Controller
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>
> >From: Lee Jones [mailto:lee.jones@...aro.org]
> missing commit log :-)
> Though $subject is self-explanatory, but you can add more description about
> assumption and hardware caveats about the controller, and its use.
>
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> >---
> > drivers/mtd/nand/stm_nand_bch.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/mtd/stm_nand.h | 20 +++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/stm_nand_bch.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/stm_nand_bch.c
> >index 76a0d02..1a93f8d 100644
> >--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/stm_nand_bch.c
> >+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/stm_nand_bch.c
> >@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> >
> > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> >+#include <linux/delay.h>
> > #include <linux/io.h>
> > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > #include <linux/device.h>
> >@@ -102,6 +103,56 @@ static void nandi_disable_interrupts(struct nandi_controller *nandi,
> > writel(val, nandi->base + NANDBCH_INT_EN);
> > }
> >
> >+static void nandi_init_bch(struct nandi_controller *nandi, int emi_bank)
> >+{
> >+ dev_dbg(nandi->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
> >+
> >+ /* Initialise BCH Controller */
> >+ emiss_nandi_select(STM_NANDI_BCH);
> >+
> >+ /* Reset and disable boot-mode controller */
> >+ writel(BOOT_CFG_RESET, nandi->base + NANDBCH_BOOTBANK_CFG);
> >+ udelay(1);
> >+ writel(0x00000000, nandi->base + NANDBCH_BOOTBANK_CFG);
>
> Why using 'udelay' ?
> Isn't there any status register which tells you that controller is reset / initialized ?
> Or may be polling on NANDBCH_BOOTBANK_CFG may itself give you status.
Documenation says:
"The soft reset bit has to be reset to ‘0’ to de-assert the soft
reset. The soft reset bit is expected to be asserted for at least
one clock cycle for proper reset"
> >+
> >+ /* Reset AFM controller */
> >+ writel(CFG_RESET, nandi->base + NANDBCH_CONTROLLER_CFG);
> >+ udelay(1);
> >+ writel(0x00000000, nandi->base + NANDBCH_CONTROLLER_CFG);
> >+
> >+ /* Set EMI Bank */
> >+ writel(0x1 << emi_bank, nandi->base + NANDBCH_FLEX_MUXCTRL);
> >+
> >+ /* Reset ECC stats */
> >+ writel(0x7f0, nandi->base + NANDBCH_CONTROLLER_CFG);
> >+ udelay(1);
> >+
> "0x7f0" ?? please use Macro instead.
Sure.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists