linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/10] mfd: vexpress: Convert custom func API to regmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140430142922.GU29462@lee--X1>
Date:	Wed, 30 Apr 2014 15:29:22 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>
Cc:	"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	"lm-sensors@...sensors.org" <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] mfd: vexpress: Convert custom func API to regmap

> > MFD diffstat looks great and the changes look sensible:
> >   Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> > I guess someone will need to create a branch for us all to pull from.
> > I'm happy to do it if needs be.
> 
> I was thinking that, with enough acks (and I'm counting on one from you
> for "[PATCH 04/10] mfd: vexpress: Define the device as MFD cells" :-),

That won't happen right away - it's another 500+ line patch and
contary to popular believe I do have my own work to contend with too.

> merging the whole series (or at least patches 1-4 and 7-8) through
> arm-soc tree would be the simplest option. I have no problem with the
> independent bits (clk, clocksource, hwmon and the mfd/HBI change) going
> through appropriate subsystems.

I have no problem with that as long as one of the ARM-SoC guys can
provide a branch where the other subsystems can pull from.  If they
have no time, my offer still stands.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/