[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140430104114.4bdc588e@cuia.bos.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 10:41:14 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
sandeen@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jweiner@...hat.com,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, fengguang.wu@...el.com,
mpatlasov@...allels.com, Motohiro.Kosaki@...fujitsu.com
Subject: [PATCH v3] mm,writeback: fix divide by zero in pos_ratio_polynom
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 15:48:26 +0200
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz> wrote:
> This is still prone to u64 -> s32 issue, isn't it?
> What was the original problem anyway? Was it really setpoint > limit or
> rather the overflow?
This patch should avoid math overflows with both the initial
subtraction, and with use of the truncated divisor by div_s64
and div_u64.
I added redundant casts in the div_s64 and div_u64 calls to
make it clear what those functions do internally, which should
make it easy to understand why we do the same cast in the if
statements right above.
I believe this version of the patch addresses everybody's concerns.
---8<---
Subject: mm,writeback: fix divide by zero in pos_ratio_polynom
It is possible for "limit - setpoint + 1" to equal zero, leading to a
divide by zero error. Blindly adding 1 to "limit - setpoint" is not
working, so we need to actually test the divisor before calling div64.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
---
mm/page-writeback.c | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index ef41349..6405687 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -598,10 +598,15 @@ static inline long long pos_ratio_polynom(unsigned long setpoint,
unsigned long limit)
{
long long pos_ratio;
+ long divisor;
long x;
+ divisor = limit - setpoint;
+ if (!(s32)divisor)
+ divisor = 1; /* Avoid div-by-zero */
+
x = div_s64(((s64)setpoint - (s64)dirty) << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT,
- limit - setpoint + 1);
+ (s32)divisor);
pos_ratio = x;
pos_ratio = pos_ratio * x >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT;
pos_ratio = pos_ratio * x >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT;
@@ -842,8 +847,12 @@ static unsigned long bdi_position_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
x_intercept = bdi_setpoint + span;
if (bdi_dirty < x_intercept - span / 4) {
+ unsigned long divisor = x_intercept - bdi_setpoint;
+ if (!(u32)divisor)
+ divisor = 1; /* Avoid div-by-zero */
+
pos_ratio = div_u64(pos_ratio * (x_intercept - bdi_dirty),
- x_intercept - bdi_setpoint + 1);
+ (u32)divisor);
} else
pos_ratio /= 4;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists