[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1398869686.26071.151.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:54:46 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.14-rt1
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 10:33 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 10:19:19 -0400
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> > I'm testing it now. But could you please post them as regular patches.
> > They were attachments to this thread, and were not something that stood
> > out.
>
> With your two patches, it still crashes exactly the same way. I
> probably should remove my debug just in case, but I think this box has
> another problem with it.
You killed this hunk of hotplug-light-get-online-cpus.patch
@@ -333,7 +449,7 @@ static int __ref _cpu_down(unsigned int
/* CPU didn't die: tell everyone. Can't complain. */
smpboot_unpark_threads(cpu);
cpu_notify_nofail(CPU_DOWN_FAILED | mod, hcpu);
- goto out_release;
+ goto out_cancel;
}
BUG_ON(cpu_online(cpu));
..and fixed this too?
Another little bug. This hunk of patches/stomp-machine-raw-lock.patch
should be while (atomic_read(&done.nr_todo))
@@ -647,7 +671,7 @@ int stop_machine_from_inactive_cpu(int (
ret = multi_cpu_stop(&msdata);
/* Busy wait for completion. */
- while (!completion_done(&done.completion))
+ while (!atomic_read(&done.nr_todo))
cpu_relax();
mutex_unlock(&stop_cpus_mutex);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists