[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1398872038.24255.41.camel@hornet>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:33:58 +0100
From: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: "grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
"lm-sensors@...sensors.org" <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] hwmon: vexpress: Use devm helper for hwmon device
registration
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 16:27 +0100, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > I'm not sure I understand the question. The other patch from the series
>
> The code above seems to change from
>
> data->reg = devm_regmap_init_vexpress_config(&pdev->dev);
> if (!data->reg)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> to
>
> data->reg = devm_regmap_init_vexpress_config(&pdev->dev);
> if (IS_ERR(data->reg))
> return PTR_ERR(data->reg);
>
> as part of this patch. This suggests that the return value from
> devm_regmap_init_vexpress_config may have changed from NULL to
> ERR_PTR. Is my understanding wrong ?
No, you've got it right, but it's me making a mistake in patch splitting
- it is supposed to be a part of the first patch. Thanks for spotting
this!
Pawel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists