[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53612647.1040604@mentor.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 00:35:19 +0800
From: Hui Zhu <hui_zhu@...tor.com>
To: Hui Zhu <teawater@...il.com>,
Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@...all.nl>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, <pinskia@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<eparis@...hat.com>, <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"gdb@...rceware.org" <gdb@...rceware.org>,
Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix get ERESTARTSYS with m32 in x86_64 when debug by
GDB
On 05/01/14 00:28, Hui Zhu wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@...all.nl> wrote:
>>> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 22:10:15 -0700
>>> From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
>>>
>>> On 04/29/2014 10:08 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>>>
>>>> restoring the values is hard since even the ptrace interface does not
>>>> allow for that.
>>>>
>>>
>>> So that begs the ultimate question, which is: given the fact that there
>>> is *state missing* from the state vector (this is the core of the
>>> problem), is there a way we can add that state so that gdb will be able
>>> to save and restore it?
>>
>> Carrying around additional state in GDB is complicated; I'd rather
>> avoid it.
>>
>> arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c:putreg32() has this bit of code:
>>
>> case offsetof(struct user32, regs.orig_eax):
>> /*
>> * A 32-bit debugger setting orig_eax means to restore
>> * the state of the task restarting a 32-bit syscall.
>> * Make sure we interpret the -ERESTART* codes correctly
>> * in case the task is not actually still sitting at the
>> * exit from a 32-bit syscall with TS_COMPAT still set.
>> */
>> regs->orig_ax = value;
>> if (syscall_get_nr(child, regs) >= 0)
>> task_thread_info(child)->status |= TS_COMPAT;
>> break;
>>
>> which gets used for 32-bit compat ptrace(2). Perhaps the same logic
>> should be added to putreg() if the child is a 32-bit process?
>
> Make a new patch that add following code to putreg():
> case offsetof(struct user_regs_struct, orig_ax):
> /*
> * A 64-bit debugger setting orig_ax of a 32-bit inferior
> * means to restore the state of the task restarting a
> * 32-bit syscall.
> * Make sure we interpret the -ERESTART* codes correctly
> * in case the task is not actually still sitting at the
> * exit from a 32-bit syscall with TS_COMPAT still set.
> */
> if (test_ti_thread_flag(task_thread_info(child), TIF_IA32)) {
> struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(child);
> regs->orig_ax = value;
> if (syscall_get_nr(child, regs) >= 0)
> task_thread_info(child)->status |= TS_COMPAT;
> return 0;
> }
>
>>
>> If (and only if) the goal of that TS_COMPAT flag solely is to trigger
>> the error code sign-extension in
arch/x86/asm/syscall.h:syscall_get_error(),
>> we could work around to problem in GDB by checking "orig_ax" to see if
>> we're continuing an interrupted system call and sign extend the error
>> code in the real "eax" register if we are.
>
> I will update patch in
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-04/msg00429.html
> according to this comments.
>
> Thanks,
> Hui
>
I sorry that previous patch has some format issue, post a new one.
Signed-off-by: Hui Zhu <hui@...esourcery.com>
---
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -452,6 +452,23 @@ static int putreg(struct task_struct *ch
if (child->thread.gs != value)
return do_arch_prctl(child, ARCH_SET_GS, value);
return 0;
+ case offsetof(struct user_regs_struct, orig_ax):
+ /*
+ * A 64-bit debugger setting orig_ax of a 32-bit inferior
+ * means to restore the state of the task restarting a
+ * 32-bit syscall.
+ * Make sure we interpret the -ERESTART* codes correctly
+ * in case the task is not actually still sitting at the
+ * exit from a 32-bit syscall with TS_COMPAT still set.
+ */
+ if (test_ti_thread_flag(task_thread_info(child), TIF_IA32)) {
+ struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(child);
+ regs->orig_ax = value;
+ if (syscall_get_nr(child, regs) >= 0)
+ task_thread_info(child)->status |= TS_COMPAT;
+ return 0;
+ }
+ break;
#endif
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists