[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1398876964.2182.13.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:56:04 +0000
From: James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>
To: "ching2048@...ca.com.tw" <ching2048@...ca.com.tw>
CC: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dan.carpenter@...cle.com" <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
"thenzl@...hat.com" <thenzl@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1.0 1/11] arcmsr: Revise interrupt service routine
relate function
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 17:40 +0800, ching wrote:
> From: Ching<ching2048@...ca.com.tw>
>
> Rewrite interrupt service routine relate function to fix command
> timeout on controller very heavy loading.
OK, so I think you've confused us a bit. This looks to be an update of
your previous v1.4 patch set, yet it's now called v1.0?
Could you please include a cover letter as patch 0/x like you see
everyone else doing on the list? In this cover letter can you tell us
what the disposition of the previous feedback is and what other changes
have you done? You didn't reply to any of the comments, have have you
fixed them? It's very dispiriting to review 11 patches, give feedback
and not hear anything ... and then have to review an even longer set of
patches just to see if anything was done about your previous comments.
The less interactive you are with reviews, the less chance there is that
people will review updates ... without external reviewers, you go on a
very long backlog of things I have to review before the patches get in.
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists