[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5361517D.8000106@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 21:39:41 +0200
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] ARM: dts: kirkwood: consolidate common pinctrl
settings
On 04/30/2014 06:42 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 02:56:34PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>> All SoCs have the same pinctrl setting for NAND, UART0/1, SPI, TWSI0,
>> and GBE1. Move it to the common pinctrl node that we now have.
>
> There are two possible choices for UART0, UART1, and SPI on kirkwood..
>
> For instance I use this on my board:
>
> pmx_spi0: pmx-spi0 {
> marvell,pins = "mpp7", "mpp10", "mpp11", "mpp12";
> marvell,function = "spi";
> };
>
> vs
>
>> +
>> + pmx_spi: pmx-spi {
>> + marvell,pins = "mpp0", "mpp1", "mpp2", "mpp3";
>> + marvell,function = "spi";
>> + };
>
> It looks like all the boards in the kernel use the same choice, so it
> makes some sense to consolidate, but I assume a board file can
> override the marvell,pins?
Yes, there are already some boards (e.g. t5325 with spi0) overwriting
pinctrl settings instead of overwriting the pinctrl-0 property. I
thought, I keep this behavior and note it above each pinctrl node in
some of the following patches.
But your comment reminded me of something more important: there is
one set of boards using kirkwood-lsxl.dtsi which does not explicitly
set spi's pinctrl property. So this consolidation potentially breaks
spi on those boards.
An explicit Tested-by for Buffalo Linkstation LS-CHLv2 and/or LS-XHL
would be good.
> Otherwise the rest of your patchset looked sane to me.
I count that as a
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Thanks!
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists