linux-kernel - Re: [perf] more perf_fuzzer memory corruption

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 1 May 2014 13:50:42 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [perf] more perf_fuzzer memory corruption

On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 12:26:02PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 12:51:33AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > And that's the issue which puzzles us. Let's look at what we expect:
> > 
> > Now the trace shows a different story:
> > 
> >      perf_fuzzer-4387  [001]  1802.628659: sys_enter:            NR 298 (69bb58, 0, ffffffff, 12, 0, 0)
> 
> That's a per-cpu event (.pid = -1, .cpu = 12), they don't get inherited,
> so the only thing keeping it alive is the fd the child got. So
> exit_files() killing this thing makes perfect sense.
> 
> Onwards to find another funny.

awk '/alloc/ { 
	for(i=1; i<=NF; i++) { 
		if ($i ~ /^ptr=/) { 
			ptr=gensub("^ptr=","","g",$i); 
			if (ptr ~ /nil/) break; 
			seen[ptr]=1; 
			m = ++memory[ptr]; 
			if (m != 1) { 
				printf "alloc: %d ptr=%s\n", m, ptr; 
				memory[ptr] = 0; 
			} 
			break; 
		}
	}
}
/free/ { 
	for(i=1; i<=NF; i++) { 
		if ($i ~ /^ptr=/) { 
			ptr=gensub("^ptr=","","g",$i); 
			if (ptr ~ /nil/) 
				break; 
			m = --memory[ptr]; 
			if (m != 0) { 
				memory[ptr] = 0; 
				s = seen[ptr]; 
				seen[ptr] = 1; 
				if (!s) 
					break; 
				printf "free: %d ptr=%s\n", m, ptr; 
			} 
			break; 
		}
	}
}' bug.out | less

Gives fun things like:

alloc: 2 ptr=0xffff880118fda000
free: -1 ptr=0xffff880118fda000
alloc: 2 ptr=0xffff880118fda000


And if we then look at

grep ptr=0xffff880118fda000 bug.out | less

We find lovely bits such as:

     perf_fuzzer-4387  [001]  1773.427175: kmalloc:              (perf_event_alloc+0x5a) call_site=ffffffff8113a8fa ptr=0xffff880118fda000 bytes_req=1272 bytes_alloc=2048 gfp_flags=GFP_KERNEL|GFP_ZERO
     ksoftirqd/6-38    [006]  1773.457770: kfree:                (free_event_rcu+0x2f) call_site=ffffffff8113177f ptr=0xffff880118fda000
          <idle>-0     [007]  1774.020378: kfree:                (free_event_rcu+0x2f) call_site=ffffffff8113177f ptr=0xffff880118fda000
     perf_fuzzer-4387  [000]  1774.096354: kmalloc:              (perf_event_alloc+0x5a) call_site=ffffffff8113a8fa ptr=0xffff880118fda000 bytes_req=1272 bytes_alloc=2048 gfp_flags=GFP_KERNEL|GFP_ZERO


That's almost half a second between the double free, Vince, is your TSC
solid?

# grep sched_clock_stable /proc/sched_debug 
sched_clock_stable()                    : 1

Should tell, if that's a 0 reading the trace becomes a whole lot more
'interesting'.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/