[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140501144158.GB31611@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 10:41:58 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] workqueue: Split apply attrs code from its locking
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 04:40:21PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > lockdep_assert_held()
>
> Not sure... Only a small part of the function actually needs to be locked. Namely
> those doing the pwq allocations, which already have the lockdep_assert_held().
Ah, in that case, never mind.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists