[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5362998D.3030102@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 11:59:25 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <kees@...flux.net>, kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: random: Providing a seed value to VM guests
On 05/01/2014 11:53 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> A CPUID leaf or an MSR advertised by a CPUID leaf has another
> advantage: it's easy to use in the ASLR code -- I don't think there's
> a real IDT, so there's nothing like rdmsr_safe available. It also
> avoids doing anything complicated with the boot process to allow the
> same seed to be used for ASLR and random.c; it can just be invoked
> twice on boot.
>
At that point we are talking an x86-specific interface, and so we might
as well simply emulate RDRAND (urandom) and RDSEED (random) if the CPU
doesn't support them. I believe KVM already has a way to report CPUID
features that are "emulated but supported anyway", i.e. they work but
are slow.
> What's the right forum for this? This thread is probably not it.
Change the subject line?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists