[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <068139e3-50f8-4d44-972a-0296b6bc36f7@email.android.com>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 12:40:35 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: tytso@....edu, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
CC: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <kees@...flux.net>, kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: random: Providing a seed value to VM guests
As I said... I think KVM has already added an emulated instructions enumeration API.
On May 1, 2014 12:26:18 PM PDT, tytso@....edu wrote:
>On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 12:02:49PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> Is RDSEED really reasonable here? Won't it slow down by several
>> orders of magnitude?
>
>That is I think the biggest problem; RDRAND and RDSEED are fast if
>they are native, but they will involve a VM exit if they need to be
>emulated. So when an OS might want to use RDRAND and RDSEED might be
>quite different if we know they are being emulated.
>
>Using the RDRAND and RDSEED "api" certainly makes sense, at least for
>x86, but I suspect we might want to use a different way of signalling
>that a VM guest can use RDRAND and RDSEED if they are running on a CPU
>which doesn't provide that kind of access. Maybe a CPUID extended
>function parameter, if one could be allocated for use by a Linux
>hypervisor?
>
> - Ted
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists