[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrUe_pFgn27HP4JQ7XpUVJJJoj1PXU5PnznRCEY7mCaaWg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 15:32:02 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@...flux.net>
Subject: Re: random: Providing a seed value to VM guests
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 3:28 PM, <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 02:06:13PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> I still don't see the point. What does this do better than virtio-rng?
>
> I believe you had been complaining about how complicated it was to set
> up virtio? And this complexity is also an issue if we want to use it
> to initialize the RNG used for the kernel text ASLR --- which has to
> be done very early in the boot process, and where making something as
> simple as possible is a Good Thing.
It's complicated, so it won't be up until much later in the boot
process. This is completely fine for /dev/random, but it's a problem
for /dev/urandom, ASLR, and such.
>
> And since we would want to use RDRAND/RDSEED if it is available
> *anyway*, perhaps in combination with other things, why not use the
> RDRAND/RDSEED interface?
Because it's awkward. I don't think it simplifies anything.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists