Message-ID: <1398985916.1789.75.camel@misato.fc.hp.com>
Date:	Thu, 01 May 2014 17:11:56 -0600
From:	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
To:	Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
	hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, bp@...e.de,
	paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, JBeulich@...e.com, prarit@...hat.com,
	drjones@...hat.com, riel@...hat.com, gong.chen@...ux.intel.com,
	andi@...stfloor.org, lenb@...nel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] x86: initialize secondary CPU only if master CPU
 will wait for it

On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 17:11 +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> Hang is observed on virtual machines during CPU hotplug,
> especially in big guests with many CPUs. (It reproducible
> more often if host is over-committed).
> 
> It happens because master CPU gives up waiting on
> secondary CPU and allows it to run wild. As result
> AP causes locking or crashing system. For example
> as described here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/6/257
> 
> If master CPU have sent STARTUP IPI successfully,
> and AP signalled to master CPU that it's ready
> to start initialization, make master CPU wait
> indefinitely till AP is onlined.
> To ensure that AP won't ever run wild, make it
> wait at early startup till master CPU confirms its
> intention to wait for AP.

Please also add description that the master CPU times out when an AP
does not start initialization within 10 seconds.

> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>
> ---
> v2:
>  - ammend comment in cpu_init()
> v3:
>  - leave timeouts in do_boot_cpu(), so that master CPU
>    won't hang if AP doesn't respond, use cpu_initialized_mask
>    as a way for AP to signal to master CPU that it's ready
>    to start initialzation.
> v4:
>  - move common code in cpu_init() for x32/x64 in shared
>    helper function wait_for_master_cpu()
>  - add WARN_ON(cpumask_test_and_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_initialized_mask))
>    to wait_formaster_cpu()
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c |   27 +++++++-----
>  arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c    |   98 +++++++++++++-----------------------------
>  2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> index a135239..a4bcbac 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> @@ -1221,6 +1221,17 @@ static void dbg_restore_debug_regs(void)
>  #define dbg_restore_debug_regs()
>  #endif /* ! CONFIG_KGDB */
>  
> +static void wait_for_master_cpu(int cpu)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * wait for ACK from master CPU before continuing
> +	 * with AP initialization
> +	 */
> +	WARN_ON(cpumask_test_and_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_initialized_mask));
> +	while (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_callout_mask))
> +		cpu_relax();
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * cpu_init() initializes state that is per-CPU. Some data is already
>   * initialized (naturally) in the bootstrap process, such as the GDT
> @@ -1236,16 +1247,17 @@ void cpu_init(void)
>  	struct task_struct *me;
>  	struct tss_struct *t;
>  	unsigned long v;
> -	int cpu;
> +	int cpu = stack_smp_processor_id();
>  	int i;
>  
> +	wait_for_master_cpu(cpu);
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Load microcode on this cpu if a valid microcode is available.
>  	 * This is early microcode loading procedure.
>  	 */
>  	load_ucode_ap();
>  
> -	cpu = stack_smp_processor_id();
>  	t = &per_cpu(init_tss, cpu);
>  	oist = &per_cpu(orig_ist, cpu);
>  
> @@ -1257,9 +1269,6 @@ void cpu_init(void)
>  
>  	me = current;
>  
> -	if (cpumask_test_and_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_initialized_mask))
> -		panic("CPU#%d already initialized!\n", cpu);
> -
>  	pr_debug("Initializing CPU#%d\n", cpu);
>  
>  	clear_in_cr4(X86_CR4_VME|X86_CR4_PVI|X86_CR4_TSD|X86_CR4_DE);
> @@ -1336,13 +1345,9 @@ void cpu_init(void)
>  	struct tss_struct *t = &per_cpu(init_tss, cpu);
>  	struct thread_struct *thread = &curr->thread;
>  
> -	show_ucode_info_early();
> +	wait_for_master_cpu(cpu);
>  
> -	if (cpumask_test_and_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_initialized_mask)) {
> -		printk(KERN_WARNING "CPU#%d already initialized!\n", cpu);
> -		for (;;)
> -			local_irq_enable();
> -	}
> +	show_ucode_info_early();
>  
>  	printk(KERN_INFO "Initializing CPU#%d\n", cpu);
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> index ae2fd97..44903ad 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -111,7 +111,6 @@ atomic_t init_deasserted;
>  static void smp_callin(void)
>  {
>  	int cpuid, phys_id;
> -	unsigned long timeout;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If waken up by an INIT in an 82489DX configuration
> @@ -130,37 +129,6 @@ static void smp_callin(void)
>  	 * (This works even if the APIC is not enabled.)
>  	 */
>  	phys_id = read_apic_id();
> -	if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpuid, cpu_callin_mask)) {
> -		panic("%s: phys CPU#%d, CPU#%d already present??\n", __func__,
> -					phys_id, cpuid);
> -	}
> -	pr_debug("CPU#%d (phys ID: %d) waiting for CALLOUT\n", cpuid, phys_id);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * STARTUP IPIs are fragile beasts as they might sometimes
> -	 * trigger some glue motherboard logic. Complete APIC bus
> -	 * silence for 1 second, this overestimates the time the
> -	 * boot CPU is spending to send the up to 2 STARTUP IPIs
> -	 * by a factor of two. This should be enough.
> -	 */
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Waiting 2s total for startup (udelay is not yet working)
> -	 */
> -	timeout = jiffies + 2*HZ;
> -	while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
> -		/*
> -		 * Has the boot CPU finished it's STARTUP sequence?
> -		 */
> -		if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpuid, cpu_callout_mask))
> -			break;
> -		cpu_relax();
> -	}
> -
> -	if (!time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
> -		panic("%s: CPU%d started up but did not get a callout!\n",
> -		      __func__, cpuid);
> -	}
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * the boot CPU has finished the init stage and is spinning
> @@ -750,8 +718,8 @@ static int do_boot_cpu(int apicid, int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
>  	unsigned long start_ip = real_mode_header->trampoline_start;
>  
>  	unsigned long boot_error = 0;
> -	int timeout;
>  	int cpu0_nmi_registered = 0;
> +	unsigned long timeout;
>  
>  	/* Just in case we booted with a single CPU. */
>  	alternatives_enable_smp();
> @@ -799,6 +767,14 @@ static int do_boot_cpu(int apicid, int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> +	 * AP might wait on cpu_callout_mask in cpu_init() with
> +	 * cpu_initialized_mask set if previous attempt to online
> +	 * it timed-out. Clear cpu_initialized_mask so that after
> +	 * INIT/SIPI it could start with a clean state.
> +	 */
> +	cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cpu_initialized_mask);

I think smp_mb() should be added here to ensure that the target AP sees
this change.

> +
> +	/*
>  	 * Wake up a CPU in difference cases:
>  	 * - Use the method in the APIC driver if it's defined
>  	 * Otherwise,
> @@ -810,55 +786,41 @@ static int do_boot_cpu(int apicid, int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
>  		boot_error = wakeup_cpu_via_init_nmi(cpu, start_ip, apicid,
>  						     &cpu0_nmi_registered);
>  
> +
>  	if (!boot_error) {
>  		/*
> -		 * allow APs to start initializing.
> +		 * Wait 10s total for a response from AP
>  		 */
> -		pr_debug("Before Callout %d\n", cpu);
> -		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_callout_mask);
> -		pr_debug("After Callout %d\n", cpu);
> +		boot_error = -1;
> +		timeout = jiffies + 10*HZ;
> +		while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
> +			if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_initialized_mask)) {
> +				/*
> +				 * Tell AP to proceed with initialization
> +				 */
> +				cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_callout_mask);
> +				boot_error = 0;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +			udelay(100);
> +			schedule();
> +		}
> +	}

When 10s passed, the master could set a new flag, ex.
cpu_callout_error_mask, which wait_for_master_cpu() checks and call
play_dead() when it is set.  This avoids AP to spin forever when 10s
becomes not long enough.  But it does not have to be part of this
patchset, though.  

> +	if (!boot_error) {
>  		/*
> -		 * Wait 5s total for a response
> +		 * Wait till AP completes initial initialization

We should generally avoid such wait w/o a timeout condition, but since
native_cpu_up() waits till cpu_online(cpu) anyway after this point, this
seems OK...  I wonder if we need touch_nmi_watchdog(), though.

Thanks,
-Toshi


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists