lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 21:05:57 -0700 From: Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com> To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de> Cc: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] of: Add vendor prefix for Linear Technology Corporation On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:26 AM, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de> wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 29.04.2014, 15:44 -0500 schrieb Rob Herring: >> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de> wrote: >> > Add Linear Technology Corporation to the list of device tree vendor prefixes. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de> >> > --- >> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 + >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> > >> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt >> > index 0f01c9b..3d27991 100644 >> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt >> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt >> > @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ lantiq Lantiq Semiconductor >> > lg LG Corporation >> > linux Linux-specific binding >> > lsi LSI Corp. (LSI Logic) >> > +ltc Linear Technology Corporation >> >> >> Following the use of stock symbols, this should be lltc. Is this already in use? > > [Added Tim Harvey to Cc] > > That depends on the definition of 'in use'. > > grep found arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-gw5[123]xx.dtsi containing > a "ltc,ltc3676" compatible, but I haven't seen the corresponding > driver yet. I suspect at this point we still can switch to use lltc > instead of ltc as vendor prefix without hurting anybody. > > regards > Philipp > Hi Philipp, Right, it can be changed. That node is a placeholder to describe the hardware until myself or someone else has time to write the driver for it. Regards, Tim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists