[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPUj1OML_Rag3gxxBzswS6yaqFciuq2hKrV9BthL2OwU+wNj3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 18:04:53 +0530
From: Mj Embd <mj.embd@...il.com>
To: kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@...nelnewbies.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Subject: Re: Linux Interrupt Context maps to ARM CPSR.mode = IRQ
Adding Marc to comment
Marc Please clarify the doubt
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Mj Embd <mj.embd@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As per a lot of linux documentation some components work in process
> context and some work in interrupt context.
>
> If we try to map these contexts to ARM processor modes then is it
> safely to assume that
> Process Context : CPSR.mode = SVC
> Interrupt Context : CPSR.mode = IRQ
>
> If not how to define interrupt context properly. Confusing at times.
>
> --
> -mj
--
-mj
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists