linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] ARM: dma: Use dma_pfn

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5363B42C.4010404@ti.com>
Date:	Fri, 2 May 2014 11:05:16 -0400
From:	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] ARM: dma: Use dma_pfn_offset for dma address translation

On Friday 02 May 2014 10:58 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:30:05AM -0400, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
>> index e701a4d..424fda9 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
>> @@ -58,22 +58,35 @@ static inline int dma_set_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
>>  #ifndef __arch_pfn_to_dma
>>  static inline dma_addr_t pfn_to_dma(struct device *dev, unsigned long pfn)
>>  {
>> -	return (dma_addr_t)__pfn_to_bus(pfn);
>> +	if (!dev)
>> +		return (dma_addr_t)__pfn_to_bus(pfn);
>> +	else
>> +		return (dma_addr_t)__pfn_to_bus(pfn - dev->dma_pfn_offset);
> 
> I really don't trust gcc to do this right, so I think it would be better
> to make life easier on the compiler:
> 
> 	if (dev)
> 		pfn -= dev->dma_pfn_offset;
> 	return (dma_addr_t)__pfn_to_bus(pfn);
> 
This looks better. Will udpate with above.

>>  static inline unsigned long dma_to_pfn(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr)
>>  {
>> -	return __bus_to_pfn(addr);
>> +	if (!dev)
>> +		return __bus_to_pfn(addr);
>> +	else
>> +		return __bus_to_pfn(addr) + dev->dma_pfn_offset;
> 
> and:
> 
> 	unsigned long pfn = __bus_to_pfn(addr);
> 
> 	if (dev)
> 		pfn += dev->dma_pfn_offset;
> 
> 	return pfn;
> 
Ok..

>>  }
>>  
>>  static inline void *dma_to_virt(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr)
>>  {
>> -	return (void *)__bus_to_virt((unsigned long)addr);
>> +	if (!dev)
>> +		return (void *)__bus_to_virt((unsigned long)addr);
>> +	else
>> +		return (void *)__bus_to_virt(__pfn_to_bus(dma_to_pfn(dev, addr)));
> 
> This is quite horrendous.  There's easier ways to do this...  I assume
> you haven't looked at the assembler resulting from this at all with
> stuff like the p2v patching enabled?
> 
I haven't. Will check.

>>  }
>>  
>>  static inline dma_addr_t virt_to_dma(struct device *dev, void *addr)
>>  {
>> -	return (dma_addr_t)__virt_to_bus((unsigned long)(addr));
>> +	if (!dev)
>> +		return (dma_addr_t)__virt_to_bus((unsigned long)(addr));
>> +	else
>> +		return pfn_to_dma(dev,
>> +				__bus_to_pfn(__virt_to_bus((unsigned long)(addr))));
> 
> Same here.
> 
ok.

Thanks !!

Regards,
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/