[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140502153019.GA9179@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 16:30:21 +0100
From: Steve Capper <steve.capper@...aro.org>
To: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] arm64: TLB flush issues
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 11:20:33AM -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
> As explained in more detail in the second patch, I have observed a soft
> lockup under some loads. These lockups were in flush_tlb_kernel_range()
> which was looping through a very large address range. While looking into
> this, I also noticed the flush routines in tlb.S were not properly
> handling pages larger than 4k. This is corrected in the first patch.
> The second patch limits the loop size for the flush_tlb_[kernel_]range
> functions. It uses an arbitrary constant to limit the loop, but it
> would be better if it were based on actual tlb size or some other
> heuristic.
>
> Mark Salter (2):
> arm64: fix unnecessary tlb flushes
> arm64: fix soft lockup due to large tlb flush range
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> arch/arm64/mm/tlb.S | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
Hi Mark,
As a heads-up, I posted this earlier today:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-May/252837.html
Cheers,
--
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists